|
A friend recently asked me for some hints about interviewing. In
particular, about interviewing eyewitnesses of events that happened
long ago. Here's what I told him:
Russell's Rules for Interviews
(1) These guys usually remember telling the story, not
the actual event itself. Thus, expect some embellishments and inaccuracies.
(2) Historic personalities frequently get upset if you
imply that they are wrong about something. Remember, they consider
themselves experts. If they tell you something that you know is
wrong, very delicately indicate that you thought it was a bit different.
If they don't go along with that, just make a note to yourself and
move on.
(3) Different people will have different remembrances.
Expect it - don't be surprised. You will have to get all the information
you can from multiple sources, then average it out. It's part of
the job.
(4) Be prepared. Know the subject area, the major figures,
and the major developments. Have a general knowledge of the story
beforehand. Interviewees expect that you already have some expertise
on the subject. If you don't, you might as well get a job as a TV
reporter.
(Apologies to Dawn.)
(5) Have them give you a rough timeline of events first,
then go back and discuss these events in order and in detail. This
lets you know what the major issues are before you get started with
documenting details.
(6) Don't let your interviewee meander. They frequently
like to jump ahead in their stories to other stories. Your chronology
will get all out of whack if you let them. Politely mention that
you need to keep the interview in time sequential order.
(7) If you record the interview (and you should), also
summarize everything on paper as you go. Then you'll know where
to find items in the recording later by looking at your notes. And
if you don't own a palm-sized digital recorder, purchase one immediately.
|